Country explorer10-country sampleTraceability, not ranking

Country evidence chains, not country rankings.

Each assessed country is presented as a public evidence chain. The review measures what can be reconstructed from public sources, not the quality or effectiveness of national AMR implementation.

These findings measure public evidence traceability, not the quality or effectiveness of national AMR implementation.
View countriesReview method
Country explorer

Different reporting environments produce different levels of public traceability.

A country may have serious AMR work that is not publicly reconstructable from the reviewed sources. The cards below show evidence-chain visibility only.

Ghana

AFRO · LMICHigh sources
5/8 traceable2 not assessed

Bangladesh

SEARO · LMICMedium sources
3/8 traceable3 not assessed

Sri Lanka

SEARO · UMICLow sources
1/8 traceable4 not assessed

Nigeria

AFRO · LMICMedium sources
5/8 traceable2 not assessed

India

SEARO · LMICMedium sources
4/8 traceable3 not assessed

Thailand

SEARO · UMICHigh sources
5/8 traceable1 not assessed

United Kingdom

EURO · HICHigh sources
7/8 traceable0 not assessed

Ethiopia

AFRO · LICLow sources
1/8 traceable5 not assessed

Philippines

WPRO · UMICMedium sources
5/8 traceable3 not assessed

Peru

AMRO · UMICLow sources
1/8 traceable3 not assessed
Evidence review

Return to the flagship finding and full 10-country traceability chart.

 Methodology

See how the edge definitions, sample and review limitations were frozen.

 Novelty review

Read the bounded prior-work and distinctive-approach statement.